Nanook; his wife, Nyla; and their family are introduced as fearless heroes who endure rigors no other race could survive. For the time, it had groundbreaking footage that, before that time, nobody would have dreamed of filming. I don’t condemn Flaherty for recreating certain situations. The documentary really allowed its audience to personally meet Nanook and his people. Although I now know that a lot of the elements were fabricated, I still felt as though I experienced another way of life. With it being black and white and having to read of off the film as well. The documentary was entertaining, while teaching us the way they lived, giving you an appreciation for how we live today. Nanook of the North kept me invested in a way that made the experiences palpable and I viewed the Inuit people in a light different than that of being ethnographic subjects. Overall I would watched it again, and again. I love these kind of historic films, the whole story is being told by the visuals and the music. This film gave a very good look into the life of the Inuits and their way of life. I like how close he kept it to they way they actually lived. Learning about the lands and people there, Flaherty decided to bring a camera with him on his third expedition in 1913, but knowing nothing about film, Flaherty took a three-week course on cinematography in Rochester, New York. Numerous shots just linger in either under or over exposed lighting conditions. I’m glad I got to learn about a new culture and, more to that, the first film to ever be called a documentary. He believed that if Eskimos could tame nature, then the rest of us could tame our more advanced civilisation. The film-maker was somewhat open about ‘casting’ the Inuit family to do deeds that were long obsolete (even in 1920), as he wanted to show, “the former majesty and character of these people before the white man destroys it”. with terms like “starving”. This would be the second time I’ve seen this. Nonetheless, it was an intriguing film. I can understand why it went over so well with the public. Hence, the film calls to our attention one of the perpetually visualized conflicts in cinema: Man Vs Nature. I can honestly say that I rather enjoyed watching this documentary. I understand wanting different angles but after the first time I feel the realism is gone. It was really interesting and everything was real, felt like I was apart of it. It was very interesting to see how this community survived those incredibly hard conditions, and even though some of it was staged or somehow directed it is an incredible work. I thought this film did well in trying to capture true moments with Nanook and his family even though some things were staged. By Robert J Flaherty. The music was also took a huge role in conveying the emotion meant to be felt in each scene. But it was making those criticized changes that made this film so much more informational in a certain sense. I am both pleased and grateful to say that not only did this anthropological piece keep my interest, but was very efficient in providing me with an efficient idea of the lives of eskimos in the 1920s. I think the most interesting part of the whole thing to me was the hunting and how to survive aspect of it.

Keo Motsepe Partners, City Of Ghosts Book Summary, Unanimous Meaning In Malayalam, Please Smile In Spanish, Shadow Metaphor Examples, Kitab Al-azif, Mogwai Vs Gremlin, Simpsons Military Episodes, The Jackson 5 - I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus Other Recordings Of This Song,